Malta: The EU Alternative Fund Domicile of Choice

With uncertainties still surrounding the major political disruptor that is Brexit, it is no surprise that many financial industry players have started taking action toward creating a secure presence within the rest of the EU, while settlement over final negotiations is still awaited.

Choosing an alternative fund or fund-management domicile is no easy task and can in fact be considered as one of the biggest challenges facing industry players today. There are a number of fundamental considerations involved in such decision and Malta has positioned itself as an ideal contender on many fronts in this regard, offering a number of opportunities and advantages.

The key considerations listed below are in fact also the factors which have contributed to the growth in Malta’s fund industry over the past decades, thereby making the Island a jurisdiction surely to be considered:


The geographic location of a domicile has multiple ramifications on various other business aspects and operational considerations including the location of the end investors and ease of access to the jurisdiction in terms of flight connections and time-zone. Located in the centre of the Mediterranean, Malta has historically always been an extremely coveted island. With both English and Maltese recognised as official languages, and multiple daily flight connections to the largest European financial centres including Switzerland, London and Germany, the Island is well-positioned as an ideal gateway to Europe, while leaving an open door to the financial services businesses of the Arab world. 

Legal and Regulatory Framework Innovation

Again, these considerations are important both from an operational perspective in terms of how the fund or fund management company can operate, as well as from the end-investors’ perspective in assessing the security of their chosen investment vehicle. In this regard, it must be remembered that Malta has been a member of the EU since 2004 and is therefore fully compliant with all the relevant regulations, often being among the first EU jurisdictions to successfully adopt new EU directives. That being said, however, there is still at time room for variety and innovation across jurisdictions; an area in which Malta certainly does not lag behind. 
With the introduction and implementation of the Alternative Investment Fund Managers’ Directive (AIFMD), the Malta Financial Services Authority (MFSA) announced that although it implemented all ESMA’s guidelines on remuneration policy, it decided not to transpose ESMA’s controversial guideline that AIFMs should be required to impose equivalent remuneration policies and restrictions on its sub-manager and other delegates. This renders Malta the only member state that enables outsourcing of day-to-day investment management without the risk of claw-backs of management fees paid to the delegate.

In recent years, Malta’s fund industry has seen most of its growth occurring in the alternative space, through the Professional Investor Fund (PIF) regime. This regime has easily become Malta’s strongest selling point and the most popular fund structure for de-minimis managers who fall out-of-scope of the full onerous AIFMD requirements, thereby benefitting from more flexibility and a lighter regime. PIFs target ‘qualifying investors’ with a minimum investment of €100,000 per investor and are attractive in that they can be self-managed by a fund-appointed Investment Committee. There are also no leverage or investment restrictions, no custody requirements beyond adequate safekeeping arrangements and PIFs can host all alternative strategies (hedge funds, Private Equity, Real Estate, Distressed Debt…).

Notified Alternative Investment Funds (NAIFs) are another innovative fund type, this time benefitting from the AIFMD passport unlike PIFs. NAIFs may be seen as a fast-track solution for alternative investment fund managers (AIFMs under AIFMD), based in any EU country, to set up and launch AIFs in Malta. Here, the MFSA provides templates for the application documentation. Once such application is submitted by the AIFM, the AIF will be included in the list of Notified AIFs in good standing within ten days, subject to satisfactory vetting by the MFSA. NAIFs are essentially unlicensed and not subject to ongoing supervision by the regulator, rather the due diligence and ongoing monitoring responsibilities are vested within the AIFM filing the notification. 

Malta is also widely embracing the digital advancements within the financial services sector. The MFSA has issued a supplementary PIF Rule Book for Virtual Currency Funds, while the local government is committed to support Malta’s positioning as a global leader in the blockchain sector with the approval of relevant legislation by the Maltese Parliament, namely: Virtual Financial Assets Act, Innovative Technological Arrangement and Services Act and Malta Digital Innovation Authority Act.

One of the most valued benefits of the regulator in Malta is the visible pro-business approach the MFSA has adopted. The MFSA continues to be an accessible regulator and maintain a degree of flexibility in suiting the funds’ (managers’) needs when these falls within the relevant regulation and are still fully compliant with EU rules.

Operational and Service Framework

Aside from the regulatory framework, funds also necessitate a jurisdiction with a highly developed operational and service infrastructure. The quality of service providers present is important to investors and managers alike as is the availability of experienced and competent support services such as legal and accounting firms. In Malta, this framework continues to grow with the presence of no less than 26 fund administrators, 188 company services providers and 8 depositaries/custodians. Notable is also the strong presence of all the “Big Four” accounting firms, as well as a large number of highly specialised law firms.


A highly skilled and competent workforce is therefore also important to maintain the good quality and reputation of the service providers present. Malta is certainly not lacking in this regard. With the presence of an excellent education system and a growing number of students continuing on to pursue tertiary education and beyond, Malta boasts a highly-skilled, hardworking and multilingual workforce.

Time-to-Market and Set-Up and Ongoing Costs

The speed of set-up from fund conception to launch is another significant consideration. Moreover, the set-up and particularly the ongoing fees charged to funds are of utmost importance, especially when it comes to smaller, de-minimis structures. Malta is an ideal domicile for such smaller funds and managers, offering less onerous and more efficient solutions both from a timeliness perspective, as well as in terms of costs.
With reference to the above key considerations, Malta clearly ticks all the boxes as an alternative European fund domicile of choice. With no less than 600 investment funds currently based on the island, Malta has firmly established itself as the EU alternative fund domicile of choice, being very attractive to the de-minimis fund managers who often find setting up in the more traditionally established jurisdictions such as Luxembourg and Ireland, somewhat more challenging. It is therefore no wonder that the Island is becoming an increasingly popular choice among fund promoters and managers from all over Europe, and some other parts of the world too, with redomiciliations of offshore funds to Malta also generating increased interest over the years. 

BOV Fund Services Ltd